Monday, February 18, 2013

Personality test

A person's bike says a lot about its owner. Is it a top-of-the-line machine? Or is it a notch or two below? Is it merely a two-wheeled tool to get to from point A to point B?

Is it kept impeccably clean and well-tuned, or has it had the crap kicked out of it all winter? (Note: You can still have both — it just depends on how much time you have on your hands.) Fenders? A computer?

What about this: Is your bike an old Trek comfort hybrid with a downhill fork attached? Powered by a weed-whacker motor and driven with a bungee cord? Using a Nalgene bottle as a gas tank? What could that say about its owner?

It's easy to write this off as a string of increasingly outrageous absurdities, but this bike is very, very real. It exists. We saw it in Council Bluffs yesterday. (Of course it was in Council Bluffs.) Behold:

The longer we looked at it, the scarier it got. There's some definite engineering (or jerry-rigging) going on in there. The right side of the bike, which I didn't photograph, features the top part of the weed-whacker motor. The black circle in the front triangle is the bottom part of it. And the bungee cord — I don't even want to know how that thing was settled upon as the driver of the system.

Then there's the Nalgene bottle. A NALGENE BOTTLE IS THE GAS TANK.

The bike's owner rambled out of the convenience store as we were leaving yesterday. We had 20 miles or so to go in what would turn into a climby, windy, 75-mile day. It was a very good ride. Hard, but necessary. I don't know how many miles the other cyclist in our midst logged that day. From the looks of it, this was a bike designed for transportation only — not for playtime, like ours. That's OK, because the bicycle is awesome in a number of applications.

Even so, this thing is borderline scary and most likely a bit dangerous. It's a lot like riding with Lucas, actually.


4 comments:

munsoned said...

3 things interest me about that bike based on this picture alone.

1. Where's the rear brake?!?

2. The seatpost is backwards. That is, unless he's a triathlete since they use their posts both ways (HA!)to mess with their fit for more aerodynamics. However, I don't think he could ever be that aero or efficient on that bike. Maybe hence the motor?

3. How in the world is that drive rim attached to the rear wheel?!? Is it just pinch-bolted on to a few of the spokes? Welded?

This is my kind of mad scientist tinkerer. All it needs a little duct tape to complete the ensemble.

RadRenner said...

A fine example of "redneck engineering". Some people will do anything not to ride a bike.

bryan said...

mike - items 1 and 3: I have no idea. I didn't even want to TOUCH the thing.

dave - he was pedaling when he left. Never heard the motor kick in, though. Maybe it's just for hills?

Hobby Bob said...

Honestly, I think it would be safer to ride that bike than to ride with Lucas. ;-)